What was the majority opinion in Obergefell V Hodges?
Justice Anthony Kennedy authored the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. The majority held that state same-sex marriage bans are a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses.
What were the main arguments in the Obergefell V Hodges case?
First, “the right to personal choice regarding marriage is inherent in the concept of individual autonomy.” Second, “the right to marry is fundamental because it supports a two-person union unlike any other in its importance to the committed individuals,” a principle applying equally to same-sex couples.
What was the final decision of Obergefell V Hodges?
Hodges, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) on June 26, 2015, that state bans on same-sex marriage and on recognizing same-sex marriages duly performed in other jurisdictions are unconstitutional under the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Who won the case of Obergefell V Hodges?
The case was heard on April 28, 2015. On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a landmark decision that the 14th Amendment requires all states to license marriages between same-sex couples and to recognize all marriages that were lawfully performed out of state.
What level of scrutiny was used in Obergefell v. Hodges?
The Supreme Court has held that governmental action infringing upon fundamental rights is subject to strict scrutiny,26 and thus must be narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest.
In which of the following decisions did the Supreme Court use an argument most similar to the one in the Federalist No 78?
In which of the following decisions did the Supreme Court use an argument most similar to the one in The Federalist No. 78? In Baker v. Carr (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that a state legislature would have to redraw their representative districts in order to comply with the Constitution.
Which of the following statements best explains Martin Luther King’s argument regarding democratic participation in the above excerpt?
Which of the following statements best explains Martin Luther King’s argument regarding democratic participation in the above excerpt? A law affecting African Americans is unjust if they had no part in creating it as a result of being denied the right to vote.
In which of the following decisions did the Supreme Court use an argument most similar to the one in the Federalist No 78 quizlet?
What are the main arguments in Anti-Federalist 78?
Publius in The Federalist 78 suggested that having judicial review was advantageous because it afforded federal judges “an essential safeguard against the effects of occasional ill humours in the society.” Antifederalist Brutus argued that federal judges would be “independent of the people, of the legislature, and of …
Why did Dr King and his supporters decide to delay their actions?
and the others decide to delay their actions? Martin Luther King Jr. and the others decided to delay their actions because of the upcoming mayoral election.
Which of the following is most likely to be considered speech that is protected by the First Amendment?
Political speech is the most highly protected type of speech under the First Amendment.
How does Hamilton support his argument that the judicial branch would be the least powerful of the three branches of government?
On what grounds does Hamilton argue that the judicial department of government is the least powerful branch of government? It has the least capacity to annoy or injure the political rights of the Constitution.
What were Hamilton’s two main points Federalist 78?
1. One of the main themes in Hamilton’s Essay #78 is “judicial independence” or the necessity that the judicial branch be truly separate from the executive and legislative branches. How does Hamilton make this argument? judges and life terms.
What argument did the Anti-Federalists make about the Supreme Court?
Similar to how they felt about the rest of the proposed federal government, the Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution granted too much power to the federal courts, at the expense of the state and local courts. They argued that the federal courts would be too far away to provide justice to the average citizen.
What was the Supreme Court decision in Thompson v Oklahoma?
Thompson v. Oklahoma: Juvenile Death Penalty Insight and Analysis The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Thompson v. Oklahoma that mere deterrence is not a valid reason for a jury or judge to sentence a 15-year-old juvenile to the death penalty.
Why did Thompson believe he was beyond any severe penalty?
The psychologist testified that Thompson believed that because of his age he was beyond any severe penalty of the law, and accordingly did not believe there would be any severe repercussions from his behavior. Numerous other witnesses testified about Thompson’s prior abusive behavior.
Did Thompson understand the difference between right and wrong?
A clinical psychologist who had examined Thompson testified at the second hearing that, in her opinion, Thompson understood the difference between right and wrong, but had an antisocial personality that could not be modified by the juvenile justice system.
What was the significance of the case Thompson v Thompson?
The holding in Thompson was expanded on by Roper v. Simmons (2005), where the Supreme Court extended the “evolving standards” rationale to those under 18 years old. William Wayne Thompson was a 15-year-old repeat offender from Grady County, Oklahoma. His sister, Vicki, was married to Charles Keene, who was accused of beating Vicki and William.